The case against OSU and the Dirty Game? Seems there may have been better targets, and it should of stayed on focus but…
Well maybe not a crock but was very poorly done, when faced with multiple “incorrect” statements things were edited and changed and then they try to change the initial purpose?
http://newsok.com/former-si-staffer-examines-the-dirty-game/article/3884181
http://mediumhappy.com/?p=4050
The biggest questions and lies and sensationalism from SI:
1. Does our story explain HOW Oklahoma State improved, which is our stated purpose in embarking upon this series? (The answer is “No”, by the way). Because Stanford improved greatly over the same time period. So, for a time, did Notre Dame. And they don’t, to my mind, pay players or do the hostess sexing (Notre Dame does not even
“And Now the Rest of the Story – “Check the links–it was a Crock!